
Tap and bottled water are evaluated using similar quality standards, but tap water is tested more frequently and has more independent oversight by state and federal environmental authorities (e.g., U.S. EPA and state Departments of Environmental Protection).
The FDA regulates bottled water quality, but often lacks the capacity to adequately regulate bottled water and largely relies on bottled water corporations to police themselves. Also, the FDA has little jurisdiction over the roughly 60 percent of bottled water that is bottled and consumed in the same state (Gleick, 2005; NRDC, 1999).
A recent report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that FDA’s regulation of bottled water, particularly when compared with EPA’s regulation of tap water, reveal key differences in the agencies’ statutory authorities. Of particular note, “FDA does not have the specific statutory authority to require bottlers to use certified laboratories for water quality tests or to report test results, even if violations of the standards are found (GAO, 2009).”
There are several NSF/ANSI standards for drinking water treatment units (e.g., water filters).
Universities can use standards from the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education’s (AASHE) Sustainability Tracking, Assessing and Reporting System (STARS) program to document and report progress on sustainability initiatives.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Act, 1974 (Amended in 1986 and 1996).
This law gives the EPA power to set monitoring, treatment, and contaminant standards for the drinking water sources and supply of all U.S. public water systems. Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) are set for over 90 naturally occurring as well as man-made contaminants. However, many contaminants are not covered. State standards must meet or exceed the legal limits set by the EPA and both the EPA and the States are responsible for enforcing compliance with these standards. Water systems are tested regularly and randomly at various points in the distribution path. Water suppliers are required to report all violations and remedial actions in Consumer Confidence Reports (see the Cost, Quality, and Supply section of this Guide for more on these reports).
United States Food and Drug Administration, Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 1938 (FFDCA).
Under the FFDCA, bottled water transported across state lines is regulated as a packaged food product. Bottled water processed, packaged and sold within a single state is regulated by that state. Standards applicable to bottled water can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Title 21 of the CFR defines the various types of bottled water; sets limits for certain contaminants; lists labeling requirements; and establishes processing and bottling regulations under the Current Good Manufacturing Practice. The FDA is required to adopt standards for bottled water that are no less stringent than the EPA’s standards for tap water. However, it is the responsibility of the bottler to make sure its water can pass FDA tests and inspections. However, since “bottled water plants generally are assigned low priority for inspection,” inspectors tend to focus primarily on plants that have received several complaints or have a previous history of violations (Posnick and Kim, 2002). There is no mandated reporting for bottled water companies, and consumers do not have a guaranteed right to know the contaminants found in bottled water. Furthermore, the FFDCA does not authorize the FDA to require bottles to post test results, even if contaminants have been found. Instead, inspectors review testing records at bottling facilities; by contrast, the EPA must notify the public within 24 hours of detecting violations in tap water (GAO, 2009).
A variety of standards are available for verifying the filtration functions of treatment units. After determining which (if any) contaminants need to be removed from drinking water, choose drinking water treatment units (DWTU) certified to remove those contaminants. The following independent, third-party organizations set standards for drinking water treatment units and certify units that are verified as meeting the standards.
NSF is a non-profit organization that “conducts safety testing for the food and water industries” (Rysavy, 2007). “Through a comprehensive consensus process, the NSF Joint Committee on Drinking Water Treatment Units (DWTUs) has developed key standards for evaluation and certification of drinking water treatment units” (NSF, 2004). DWTUs that meet NSF safety standards and remove 93 percent or more of a particular contaminant are eligible to receive NSF certification for that contaminant. NSF also has standards for particular water treatment methods. A listing of NSF-certified drinking water treatment units is available at http://www.nsf.org/Certified/dwtu or 877-867-3435.
NSF standards for DWTUs include:
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE), Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS)
The STARS program is a voluntary self-assessment undertaken by many colleges and universities to track relative progress toward sustainability. Universities receive “credits” based on their performance in three categories: Education and Research, Operations, and Planning, Administration and Engagement.
While there are no specific categories pertaining to bottled water in STARS, such an initiative could help earn existing Operations credits. For example, Operations Credit 17: Waste Reduction recognizes the reduction “of the use of materials in the first place...and the total amount of materials discarded… (AASHE, 2009).” The reduced waste resulting from a bottled water ban can be included in this category. Colleges and universities can receive a maximum of five points from this credit by reducing waste by 50 percent or more relative to their 2005 baseline. For reductions under 50 percent, a formula, which measures waste reduction by campus users, is used to award points (to calculate the amount of waste reduced by eliminating bottled water in terms of plastic, energy, water and oil saved, use RPN’s Bottled Water Calculator).
In addition to receiving credits from other related categories, colleges and universities can earn an “Innovation Credit” for “new, extraordinary, unique, ground-breaking, or uncommon outcomes, policies, and practices (AASHE, 2009)” that greatly exceed the criteria of a STARS credit or is not covered elsewhere in STARS. The elimination of bottled water could possibly earn a credit in this category as well.
For more information on the STARS program and how your college or university can become involved, visit http://www.aashe.org/.
![]() |
This work by the Responsible Purchasing Network is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. |
Please contact us with corrections, additions, policies, or questions.
Submit Feedback
Contact RPN's EPEAT Outreach extern, Sarah O'Brien.